Advanced VMware Resource Management for Telecom Workloads

Posted on by

In the telecom domain, where workloads are latency-sensitive and resource-intensive, achieving optimal performance requires meticulous configuration of VMware vSphere resources. My experience managing virtualized telecom environments has taught me the importance of leveraging resource controls like shares, reservations, and limits, along with advanced techniques like vCPU pinning, latency sensitivity adjustments, and NUMA alignment. In this article, I’ll share insights and practical cases to help you configure your VMware infrastructure for telecom-grade performance.

Using Shares, Reservations, and Limits to Distribute Load

Shares, reservations, and limits are essential tools for managing resource contention and ensuring critical workloads receive the necessary resources.

Definitions:

  • Shares: Relative priority for resource allocation during contention.
  • Reservations: Guaranteed minimum resources a VM will always have.
  • Limits: Maximum resources a VM can use, preventing overconsumption.

Case in Practice:

A telecom client running core network functions like VoLTE needed to prioritize signaling workloads over monitoring systems. By configuring:

  • Shares: High for signaling VMs, normal for monitoring VMs.
  • Reservations: Guaranteed 16 GB of RAM and 4 vCPUs for each signaling VM to prevent resource starvation.
  • Limits: Capped resource use for non-critical systems to avoid impacting key services.

This setup ensured smooth operation of signaling traffic even during peak loads.

Tip:

  • Use reservations for critical telecom workloads to ensure consistent performance.
  • Avoid setting unnecessary limits on critical VMs, as they can lead to throttling during peak demand.

Why Use Physical Cores Instead of Virtual Threading?

Telecom workloads often require deterministic performance with minimal latency. While hyper-threading improves throughput for general workloads, it can introduce variability due to shared resources on physical cores.

Case in Practice:

During a 5G Core deployment, enabling hyper-threading caused unpredictable latency spikes in packet processing. Switching to physical cores with no overcommitment resolved the issue, achieving consistent sub-10ms latency.

Tip:

  • Disable hyper-threading on hosts running critical telecom functions.
  • Use vSphere’s CPU Affinity to bind vCPUs to specific physical cores.

Instance with vCPU Pinning

vCPU pinning binds a VM’s virtual CPUs to specific physical cores, reducing CPU scheduling overhead and ensuring consistent performance.

Case in Practice:

In a vRAN (virtualized Radio Access Network) deployment, CPU scheduling delays caused jitter in signal processing. Using vCPU pinning to bind vCPUs directly to physical cores eliminated these delays, achieving deterministic processing required for real-time communication.

How to Configure:

  1. Identify the physical cores available using esxtop or the host’s CPU topology.
  2. Use PowerCLI to set CPU affinity:
    Set-VM -VM "vRAN-VM01" -NumCpu 4 -CpuAffinity (0,1,2,3)

Tip:

  • Combine vCPU pinning with NUMA awareness for maximum performance.

Configuring Virtual Machine Latency Sensitivity

For ultra-low latency telecom workloads like IMS or packet gateways, adjusting the latency sensitivity of a VM can dramatically reduce delays.

How It Works:

Setting latency sensitivity to “High” reserves physical CPU and memory resources for the VM, bypassing virtualization overhead.

Case in Practice:

An IMS deployment experienced high latency during peak call volumes. By setting latency sensitivity to “High” and dedicating physical resources to the VMs, we reduced call setup times by 20%.

How to Configure:

  1. Edit VM settings in vSphere.
  2. Under Advanced Configuration, set latencySensitivity to “High”.
  3. Reserve 100% of the VM’s CPU and memory resources.

Tip:

  • Use this feature sparingly as it can increase resource fragmentation on the host.

NUMA for CPU and RAM Alignment

Non-Uniform Memory Access (NUMA) is a critical factor for performance in NUMA-based architectures, where CPU and memory are divided into nodes. Ensuring VMs are aligned to NUMA nodes improves memory access speed and reduces latency.

Why It Matters for Telecom Workloads:

Telecom applications like EPC (Evolved Packet Core) or vCDN (virtual Content Delivery Networks) require high memory bandwidth and low latency, which NUMA optimization ensures.

Case in Practice:

A vEPC deployment initially experienced high memory latency due to VMs spanning multiple NUMA nodes. After adjusting vCPU and memory configurations to fit within a single NUMA node, memory latency dropped by 30%, and session handling capacity increased by 25%.

How to Configure:

  1. Determine the NUMA topology of the host using esxtop.
  2. Configure VMs to align with NUMA boundaries:
    • Keep vCPU count within the physical cores of a single NUMA node.
    • Ensure memory allocation does not exceed the node’s capacity.
  3. Enable vNUMA for larger VMs that span multiple nodes.

Tip:

  • Monitor NUMA counters in esxtop to ensure proper alignment.

Conclusion

Optimizing VMware resources for telecom workloads requires a deep understanding of how CPU, memory, storage, and networking interplay in a virtualized environment. By strategically using shares, reservations, and limits, prioritizing physical cores over virtual threads, implementing vCPU pinning, configuring latency sensitivity, and aligning VMs to NUMA nodes, you can achieve the deterministic performance required for telecom-grade applications.

These techniques have consistently delivered results in my experience, ensuring stable, high-performance environments capable of meeting the demands of modern telecom workloads. If you’re managing virtualized telecom systems, I encourage you to test these approaches and adapt them to your specific use cases. Feel free to share your own experiences or ask questions—I’m always happy to collaborate and learn!